https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373025 An adjudication concerning a disputed remittance could not be sustained because the adjudicating authority had not obtained the Reserve Bank of India's response before deciding the matter. The record indicated that the RBI had not rejected the request and was still considering it, so the authority was expected to consult the RBI, particularly because the proceedings originated from information received from that source. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with directions to obtain the RBI's response and pass a fresh speaking order after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing. en-us Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Jan 2019 07:53:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373025 An adjudication concerning a disputed remittance could not be sustained because the adjudicating authority had not obtained the Reserve Bank of India's response before deciding the matter. The record indicated that the RBI had not rejected the request and was still considering it, so the authority was expected to consult the RBI, particularly because the proceedings originated from information received from that source. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with directions to obtain the RBI's response and pass a fresh speaking order after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373025