<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 182 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s applications, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the appellant to pay Service Tax only on the erection contract under the normal scheme, not under the composition scheme. The appellant was instructed to file a fresh computation of tax payable within a specified period for verification and compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 07:27:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 182 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s applications, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the appellant to pay Service Tax only on the erection contract under the normal scheme, not under the composition scheme. The appellant was instructed to file a fresh computation of tax payable within a specified period for verification and compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>