<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 175 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373010</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that Low Grade Bauxite is non-excisable and exempt from Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. It was held that the demand for 10%/5% of the value of exempted goods was unsustainable, and penalties under Rule 15 and Section 11AC were not justified due to the appellant&#039;s compliance with substantive requirements. The case was remanded for verification of cenvat credit reversal and reconsideration of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 175 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373010</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that Low Grade Bauxite is non-excisable and exempt from Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. It was held that the demand for 10%/5% of the value of exempted goods was unsustainable, and penalties under Rule 15 and Section 11AC were not justified due to the appellant&#039;s compliance with substantive requirements. The case was remanded for verification of cenvat credit reversal and reconsideration of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>