<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 172 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the findings of the adjudicating authority, ruling that the confiscation of stock and imposition of penalties lacked sufficient evidence. The appeals were allowed, stressing the importance of following proper procedures, requiring mens rea for penalties, and upholding principles of natural justice in adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 06:53:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 172 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the findings of the adjudicating authority, ruling that the confiscation of stock and imposition of penalties lacked sufficient evidence. The appeals were allowed, stressing the importance of following proper procedures, requiring mens rea for penalties, and upholding principles of natural justice in adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>