<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 169 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373004</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals related to availing cenvat credit on input services like car repairing and outdoor catering before 1.4.2011. The decision emphasized the lack of restrictions on claiming such credits pre-amendment, supported by relevant case laws. The impugned orders were set aside, granting the appellant relief and emphasizing the significance of the regulatory framework and precedent in determining credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 06:47:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 169 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373004</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals related to availing cenvat credit on input services like car repairing and outdoor catering before 1.4.2011. The decision emphasized the lack of restrictions on claiming such credits pre-amendment, supported by relevant case laws. The impugned orders were set aside, granting the appellant relief and emphasizing the significance of the regulatory framework and precedent in determining credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>