<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 163 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372998</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders due to the violation of natural justice and remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment orders with the petitioner required to pay 15% of the tax liability and undergo a personal hearing as per Circular No.7/2014 guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 06:26:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 163 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372998</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders due to the violation of natural justice and remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment orders with the petitioner required to pay 15% of the tax liability and undergo a personal hearing as per Circular No.7/2014 guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>