<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372997</link>
    <description>Reversal of Input Tax Credit for return mismatch cannot be sustained where pre-revision notices omit invoice-wise particulars and other material needed to verify the discrepancy. The assessing authority must first correlate the records of both dealers, attach the mismatch data and supporting reports, and then issue a proper notice enabling an effective reply. Compliance with the governing circular and principles of natural justice requires a meaningful opportunity to object and a personal hearing. On these defects, the revised assessment orders and consequential demand notices were quashed, and the matters were remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with the prescribed procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 06:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372997</link>
      <description>Reversal of Input Tax Credit for return mismatch cannot be sustained where pre-revision notices omit invoice-wise particulars and other material needed to verify the discrepancy. The assessing authority must first correlate the records of both dealers, attach the mismatch data and supporting reports, and then issue a proper notice enabling an effective reply. Compliance with the governing circular and principles of natural justice requires a meaningful opportunity to object and a personal hearing. On these defects, the revised assessment orders and consequential demand notices were quashed, and the matters were remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with the prescribed procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>