<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1405 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278023</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that transactions between the assessee and close relatives, intended for investment purposes and not commercial use, did not breach the law. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not apply to genuine transactions among family members and ruled in favor of the taxpayer, directing the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 06:21:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1405 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278023</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that transactions between the assessee and close relatives, intended for investment purposes and not commercial use, did not breach the law. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not apply to genuine transactions among family members and ruled in favor of the taxpayer, directing the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>