https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16090 A writ of prohibition was refused because the Income-tax Officer still had jurisdiction to examine the assessee's limitation plea after remand. The Tribunal had not decided limitation on merits; it only permitted the issue of limitation and jurisdiction to be raised before the assessing officer. The corrigendum made only a technical correction and did not change the substantive directions. Reading the order as a whole, the isolated use of the word "allowed" in relation to the cross-objection did not deprive the officer of authority. The availability of statutory remedies also weighed against writ interference. en-us Tue, 03 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:27:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16090 A writ of prohibition was refused because the Income-tax Officer still had jurisdiction to examine the assessee's limitation plea after remand. The Tribunal had not decided limitation on merits; it only permitted the issue of limitation and jurisdiction to be raised before the assessing officer. The corrigendum made only a technical correction and did not change the substantive directions. Reading the order as a whole, the isolated use of the word "allowed" in relation to the cross-objection did not deprive the officer of authority. The availability of statutory remedies also weighed against writ interference. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 03 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16090