<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 142 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ld CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling that the provisions of section 11(1)(c) did not apply as the expenditure was incurred in India, not outside the country. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, except for the amount spent outside India towards hotel and other expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 06:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 142 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ld CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling that the provisions of section 11(1)(c) did not apply as the expenditure was incurred in India, not outside the country. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, except for the amount spent outside India towards hotel and other expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>