https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372968 The Tribunal held that the impugned notice dated 31.08.2018 was bad in law and set it aside regarding the property in question. The order confirming the attachment and the Provisional Attachment Order were also set aside. The authorities failed to follow due process and mandatory provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The possession of the property was to be handed over to the appellant immediately, with the attachment continuing. The matter was remanded back for a fresh decision after giving due opportunity to both parties. en-us Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jan 2019 06:31:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372968 The Tribunal held that the impugned notice dated 31.08.2018 was bad in law and set it aside regarding the property in question. The order confirming the attachment and the Provisional Attachment Order were also set aside. The authorities failed to follow due process and mandatory provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The possession of the property was to be handed over to the appellant immediately, with the attachment continuing. The matter was remanded back for a fresh decision after giving due opportunity to both parties. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372968