<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 132 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372967</link>
    <description>Section 24 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 makes the Limitation Act applicable to Tribunal proceedings as far as may be, and Section 29(2) extends Sections 4 to 24 to special law proceedings unless expressly excluded. Applying the principle that exclusion of the Limitation Act may arise only by express words or necessary implication, the analysis concludes that the Debts Recovery Tribunal is not barred from considering delay under Section 5 in proceedings under Section 19. A delay application cannot be rejected merely on the assumption that the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction because the filing was beyond time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 06:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 132 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372967</link>
      <description>Section 24 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 makes the Limitation Act applicable to Tribunal proceedings as far as may be, and Section 29(2) extends Sections 4 to 24 to special law proceedings unless expressly excluded. Applying the principle that exclusion of the Limitation Act may arise only by express words or necessary implication, the analysis concludes that the Debts Recovery Tribunal is not barred from considering delay under Section 5 in proceedings under Section 19. A delay application cannot be rejected merely on the assumption that the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction because the filing was beyond time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>