<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1287 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277997</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer did not follow the proper procedure as required under Section 14A(2) and Rule 8D of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, as the AO failed to record satisfaction with the correctness of the assessee&#039;s claim based on the accounts. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 24.07.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 06:17:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1287 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277997</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer did not follow the proper procedure as required under Section 14A(2) and Rule 8D of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, as the AO failed to record satisfaction with the correctness of the assessee&#039;s claim based on the accounts. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 24.07.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>