<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1628 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278010</link>
    <description>Where the department had accepted an earlier order granting refund in a comparable matter on merits, the court held that the present assessee was entitled to the same treatment. On that basis, the appeal was allowed and the refund was directed to be released forthwith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 06:17:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1628 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278010</link>
      <description>Where the department had accepted an earlier order granting refund in a comparable matter on merits, the court held that the present assessee was entitled to the same treatment. On that basis, the appeal was allowed and the refund was directed to be released forthwith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>