<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1084 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277995</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. C.I.T.(A) and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal. It was concluded that the share capital of Rs. 69.30 lakhs received from investors was not liable to be treated u/s 68 as unexplained credits. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness of share applicants, and genuineness of the transactions, in line with judicial precedents. The decision was rendered on 19.11.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 17:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1084 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277995</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. C.I.T.(A) and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal. It was concluded that the share capital of Rs. 69.30 lakhs received from investors was not liable to be treated u/s 68 as unexplained credits. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness of share applicants, and genuineness of the transactions, in line with judicial precedents. The decision was rendered on 19.11.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>