<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 970 - HIGH COURT JAMMU AND KASHMIR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277991</link>
    <description>The court altered the conviction of the appellants to Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, sentencing them to imprisonment already undergone and a fine of Rs. 25,000 each, with an additional six months of rigorous imprisonment in default of payment. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 14:42:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 970 - HIGH COURT JAMMU AND KASHMIR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277991</link>
      <description>The court altered the conviction of the appellants to Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, sentencing them to imprisonment already undergone and a fine of Rs. 25,000 each, with an additional six months of rigorous imprisonment in default of payment. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>