https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277989 The judgment addressed the determination of compensation principles for Civil Servants transferred to the Irish Free State, focusing on alignment with Article X of the Articles of Agreement. It explored the interpretation and application of Article X, considering the validity of previous judicial decisions like Wigg v. Attorney-General of Irish Free State. The competency of the Judicial Committee to re-hear cases based on alleged factual errors was also examined. The conclusion emphasized the Board's discretion to reconsider decisions based on material factual errors, highlighting the importance of judicial flexibility and rectifying potential errors. en-us Tue, 13 Nov 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jan 2019 14:12:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277989 The judgment addressed the determination of compensation principles for Civil Servants transferred to the Irish Free State, focusing on alignment with Article X of the Articles of Agreement. It explored the interpretation and application of Article X, considering the validity of previous judicial decisions like Wigg v. Attorney-General of Irish Free State. The competency of the Judicial Committee to re-hear cases based on alleged factual errors was also examined. The conclusion emphasized the Board's discretion to reconsider decisions based on material factual errors, highlighting the importance of judicial flexibility and rectifying potential errors. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Nov 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277989