https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277988 The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutional validity of Parts I, II, and III of the Canada Temperance Act, 1927, within the legislative competence of the Parliament of Canada. The decision in Russell v. Reg. [1882] 7 A.C. 829 was deemed applicable, upholding the Act's validity due to its similarity to the previously upheld 1878 Act. The Board rejected arguments of emergency legislation and upheld the 1927 Act as a valid replacement and consolidation of the 1878 Act, dismissing the appeal without costs. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 1946 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jan 2019 13:27:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277988 The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutional validity of Parts I, II, and III of the Canada Temperance Act, 1927, within the legislative competence of the Parliament of Canada. The decision in Russell v. Reg. [1882] 7 A.C. 829 was deemed applicable, upholding the Act's validity due to its similarity to the previously upheld 1878 Act. The Board rejected arguments of emergency legislation and upheld the 1927 Act as a valid replacement and consolidation of the 1878 Act, dismissing the appeal without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Jan 1946 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277988