<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 50 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16078</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash an order releasing seized materials in a criminal case related to undisclosed wealth under the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized the need for prompt exercise of power under section 132A of the Act and highlighted the untimely invocation of such power by the petitioner. Additionally, the court found the remedy for the recovery of unassessed wealth available under the Act sufficient, leading to the dismissal of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:22:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 50 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16078</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash an order releasing seized materials in a criminal case related to undisclosed wealth under the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized the need for prompt exercise of power under section 132A of the Act and highlighted the untimely invocation of such power by the petitioner. Additionally, the court found the remedy for the recovery of unassessed wealth available under the Act sufficient, leading to the dismissal of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>