<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 111 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372946</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2008-09. The decision was based on the lack of specific charge identification in the penalty notices, following legal principles and precedents. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the deletion of penalties for the relevant assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 08:12:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 111 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372946</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2008-09. The decision was based on the lack of specific charge identification in the penalty notices, following legal principles and precedents. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the deletion of penalties for the relevant assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>