<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 104 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the AO&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the rejection of share valuation reports, adoption of share values, and determination of fair market value based on compliant valuation methods under Rule 11UA. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with Rule 11U(a) and found no merit in the arguments presented by the assessee regarding the valuation reports signed by the company&#039;s auditor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 08:12:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 104 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the AO&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the rejection of share valuation reports, adoption of share values, and determination of fair market value based on compliant valuation methods under Rule 11UA. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with Rule 11U(a) and found no merit in the arguments presented by the assessee regarding the valuation reports signed by the company&#039;s auditor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>