https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372938 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order and the AO's assessment, dismissing the appeal. The addition of Rs. 7,00,003/- to the total income was justified due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee. Agricultural income was considered exempt up to Rs. 17 lakhs based on the Horticulture Department's report. The Tribunal found that the assessee had been given adequate hearing opportunities, and the reliance on the Horticulture Department's report in the assessment process was deemed reasonable. en-us Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jan 2019 08:12:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372938 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order and the AO's assessment, dismissing the appeal. The addition of Rs. 7,00,003/- to the total income was justified due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee. Agricultural income was considered exempt up to Rs. 17 lakhs based on the Horticulture Department's report. The Tribunal found that the assessee had been given adequate hearing opportunities, and the reliance on the Horticulture Department's report in the assessment process was deemed reasonable. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372938