<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 72 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the reference application concerning the taxability of technical service fees paid by BHEL to Sulzer Brother Ltd.&#039;s engineering personnel. The court emphasized that the fees were payable pursuant to an agreement dated before April 1, 1976, as required by section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. Even though payment occurred after this date, it was linked to the pre-existing agreement. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the tax case petitions with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 72 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the reference application concerning the taxability of technical service fees paid by BHEL to Sulzer Brother Ltd.&#039;s engineering personnel. The court emphasized that the fees were payable pursuant to an agreement dated before April 1, 1976, as required by section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act. Even though payment occurred after this date, it was linked to the pre-existing agreement. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the tax case petitions with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>