https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372914 The tribunal upheld the lower authorities' Order, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide acceptable reasons for the non-service of the Demand Notice within the stipulated time frame. Address discrepancies were deemed unsubstantiated, with the tribunal emphasizing the appellant's lack of substantial arguments challenging the liability of Anti-Dumping Duty. The judgment underscores the significance of timely notice service, accurate address details, and the necessity of presenting strong arguments to effectively contest legal decisions. en-us Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372914 The tribunal upheld the lower authorities' Order, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant's failure to provide acceptable reasons for the non-service of the Demand Notice within the stipulated time frame. Address discrepancies were deemed unsubstantiated, with the tribunal emphasizing the appellant's lack of substantial arguments challenging the liability of Anti-Dumping Duty. The judgment underscores the significance of timely notice service, accurate address details, and the necessity of presenting strong arguments to effectively contest legal decisions. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372914