<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 78 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the importer&#039;s classification of imported Bonded Fabric under RITC 60063200, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 3(c) and the distinction between textile and fabric, emphasizing the specific nature of bonded fabrics covered in a Board Circular. The Tribunal found the Delhi Tribunal&#039;s judgment cited by the Revenue not applicable to the case, as it concerned only Polyester bonded fabric.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 78 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the importer&#039;s classification of imported Bonded Fabric under RITC 60063200, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 3(c) and the distinction between textile and fabric, emphasizing the specific nature of bonded fabrics covered in a Board Circular. The Tribunal found the Delhi Tribunal&#039;s judgment cited by the Revenue not applicable to the case, as it concerned only Polyester bonded fabric.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>