<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 73 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372908</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the CESTAT&#039;s decision that the respondent assessee was eligible for a refund of specific amounts related to port services and transportation charges. The CESTAT found that services within the port area qualified for refund under the head of port services, based on factual aspects and legal interpretations. The Court determined no substantial question of law, affirming the CESTAT&#039;s findings and decision to remand the matter for the remaining amount of refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 07:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 73 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372908</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the CESTAT&#039;s decision that the respondent assessee was eligible for a refund of specific amounts related to port services and transportation charges. The CESTAT found that services within the port area qualified for refund under the head of port services, based on factual aspects and legal interpretations. The Court determined no substantial question of law, affirming the CESTAT&#039;s findings and decision to remand the matter for the remaining amount of refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>