<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 68 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16067</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the special auditor&#039;s appointment under section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of considering the complexity of the accounts. It found that natural justice principles were not violated in the approval process. The court clarified that section 142(2A) applies irrespective of turnover, focusing on account complexity. The appointment of the special auditor was justified due to discrepancies in the accounts, ensuring accurate income assessment. The court directed the AO to proceed with the appointment if justified and imposed restrictions on document production and assessment communication until the petition&#039;s resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:38:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 68 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16067</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the special auditor&#039;s appointment under section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the necessity of considering the complexity of the accounts. It found that natural justice principles were not violated in the approval process. The court clarified that section 142(2A) applies irrespective of turnover, focusing on account complexity. The appointment of the special auditor was justified due to discrepancies in the accounts, ensuring accurate income assessment. The court directed the AO to proceed with the appointment if justified and imposed restrictions on document production and assessment communication until the petition&#039;s resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>