<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 69 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a consulting engineer and contractor, in an appeal against the rejection of their appeal by the Commissioner (A). The Tribunal found that the appellant had paid the Service Tax and interest before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice (SCN), rendering the penalty under Section 78 unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the penalty, granting relief to the appellant based on legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 07:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 69 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a consulting engineer and contractor, in an appeal against the rejection of their appeal by the Commissioner (A). The Tribunal found that the appellant had paid the Service Tax and interest before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice (SCN), rendering the penalty under Section 78 unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the penalty, granting relief to the appellant based on legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>