<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 65 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order related to improper availing of abatement on Maintenance or Repair services. The case was remitted for reconsideration to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to expedite the process and determine if the services provided qualified as works contract services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 06:59:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 65 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order related to improper availing of abatement on Maintenance or Repair services. The case was remitted for reconsideration to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to expedite the process and determine if the services provided qualified as works contract services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>