<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 62 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372897</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; rejection of the refund claim by a 100% EOU, emphasizing that Basic Customs Duty should not be included in the assessable value for duty calculation. The tribunal clarified that duty comparison should be made with goods produced outside the EOU. The matter was remanded for further examination regarding issues like unjust enrichment, in accordance with Section 11B, with the appeal allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 62 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372897</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; rejection of the refund claim by a 100% EOU, emphasizing that Basic Customs Duty should not be included in the assessable value for duty calculation. The tribunal clarified that duty comparison should be made with goods produced outside the EOU. The matter was remanded for further examination regarding issues like unjust enrichment, in accordance with Section 11B, with the appeal allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>