<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 54 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, ruling in favor of the appellant on both merits and limitation regarding the liability of Excise Duty under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The demand was deemed unsustainable, with no evidence of willful suppression of facts by the appellant. The appeal succeeded on both grounds, and any consequential reliefs were granted as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 06:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 54 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, ruling in favor of the appellant on both merits and limitation regarding the liability of Excise Duty under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The demand was deemed unsustainable, with no evidence of willful suppression of facts by the appellant. The appeal succeeded on both grounds, and any consequential reliefs were granted as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>