<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1138 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277970</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by granting relief on various grounds, including disallowance under Section 14A, eligibility for deduction under Section 10A, exclusion of foreign currency and telecommunication expenditure from export turnover, set-off of losses of eligible units, disallowance of expenditure by SEZ units, and disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for annual maintenance contract payments. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most issues, citing relevant legal provisions and previous decisions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring consistency with established principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 06:18:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1138 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277970</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by granting relief on various grounds, including disallowance under Section 14A, eligibility for deduction under Section 10A, exclusion of foreign currency and telecommunication expenditure from export turnover, set-off of losses of eligible units, disallowance of expenditure by SEZ units, and disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for annual maintenance contract payments. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most issues, citing relevant legal provisions and previous decisions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring consistency with established principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>