<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1819 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that cashew nuts fall within the definition of &#039;Agricultural Produce&#039; under Notification No. 13/2003 ST, entitling commission agents to exemption from service tax. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous order that denied the exemption. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the clarification by CBEC and the interpretation of the term &#039;Agricultural Produce&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 06:18:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1819 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that cashew nuts fall within the definition of &#039;Agricultural Produce&#039; under Notification No. 13/2003 ST, entitling commission agents to exemption from service tax. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous order that denied the exemption. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the clarification by CBEC and the interpretation of the term &#039;Agricultural Produce&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>