<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1771 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s exclusion of certain comparables in the software development and IT-enabled services segments under the Transactional Net Margin Method was sustained because it had recorded cogent reasons for the comparability adjustment. No legal infirmity was found in the standard applied, and the comparability exercise did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 06:18:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1771 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s exclusion of certain comparables in the software development and IT-enabled services segments under the Transactional Net Margin Method was sustained because it had recorded cogent reasons for the comparability adjustment. No legal infirmity was found in the standard applied, and the comparability exercise did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>