<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (9) TMI 32 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277969</link>
    <description>An amending Act that applies to pending suits and proceedings does not, without clear contrary intention, extinguish accrued rights or invalidate proceedings already begun under the repealed provision; the general saving rule continues to preserve them. The court also held that the amended definition of &quot;thika tenant&quot; was satisfied on the evidence where the tenancy was in a bustee for residential use and the huts had been acquired by purchase from the landlord, with the registered lease and continued holding over supporting that character. The remedial tenancy statute was construed liberally in favour of the protected class, and relief under the amended Act was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 18:11:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (9) TMI 32 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277969</link>
      <description>An amending Act that applies to pending suits and proceedings does not, without clear contrary intention, extinguish accrued rights or invalidate proceedings already begun under the repealed provision; the general saving rule continues to preserve them. The court also held that the amended definition of &quot;thika tenant&quot; was satisfied on the evidence where the tenancy was in a bustee for residential use and the huts had been acquired by purchase from the landlord, with the registered lease and continued holding over supporting that character. The remedial tenancy statute was construed liberally in favour of the protected class, and relief under the amended Act was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>