<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 339 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277966</link>
    <description>The court declared the imposition of mineral area development cess unconstitutional, ruling that it was a fee and not a tax. The State Legislature lacked the competence to impose the cess, and any amounts already collected were ordered to be refunded to the petitioners. The court allowed the petitions, restrained further recovery of the cess, and awarded costs to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 16:38:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 339 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277966</link>
      <description>The court declared the imposition of mineral area development cess unconstitutional, ruling that it was a fee and not a tax. The State Legislature lacked the competence to impose the cess, and any amounts already collected were ordered to be refunded to the petitioners. The court allowed the petitions, restrained further recovery of the cess, and awarded costs to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>