<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1693 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277957</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the modification that penalty equal to duty is not imposable for the period before 28.09.1996. The Tribunal clarified the penalty imposition under Section 11AC of the Act and upheld the demand of duty while reducing the penalty for the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 09:49:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1693 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277957</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the modification that penalty equal to duty is not imposable for the period before 28.09.1996. The Tribunal clarified the penalty imposition under Section 11AC of the Act and upheld the demand of duty while reducing the penalty for the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>