<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 42 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372877</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders for specific issues related to Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax on differential turnover. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for re-assessment within six weeks, emphasizing the consideration of submitted documents and provision of a proper personal hearing. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions regarding document submission and personal hearing opportunities to be incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 06:30:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 42 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372877</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders for specific issues related to Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax on differential turnover. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for re-assessment within six weeks, emphasizing the consideration of submitted documents and provision of a proper personal hearing. The court found the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions regarding document submission and personal hearing opportunities to be incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>