<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 57 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16051</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of expenditure on the maintenance of a guest house and depreciation on the building used as a guest house for the assessment year 1978-79. The court held that the provisions of section 37(5) of the Income-tax Act did not apply retrospectively to preclude the assessee from claiming the deduction, as the relevant amendment only operated from April 1, 1979. The court affirmed the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing that the expenses were allowable in computing business income as the guest house did not meet the definition under section 37(4) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:47:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 57 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16051</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of expenditure on the maintenance of a guest house and depreciation on the building used as a guest house for the assessment year 1978-79. The court held that the provisions of section 37(5) of the Income-tax Act did not apply retrospectively to preclude the assessee from claiming the deduction, as the relevant amendment only operated from April 1, 1979. The court affirmed the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing that the expenses were allowable in computing business income as the guest house did not meet the definition under section 37(4) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>