<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 90 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16050</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to issue the certificate under section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1997, for voluntarily disclosed income and tax paid within three months, rejecting the respondent&#039;s argument for payment within 90 days based on a circular on cheque encashment. The court emphasized the importance of the cheque delivery date and held that payment within three months was compliant with the circular clarifying tax payment timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:45:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 90 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16050</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent to issue the certificate under section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1997, for voluntarily disclosed income and tax paid within three months, rejecting the respondent&#039;s argument for payment within 90 days based on a circular on cheque encashment. The court emphasized the importance of the cheque delivery date and held that payment within three months was compliant with the circular clarifying tax payment timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>