<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 37 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372872</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in confirming the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. Despite uncrossed drafts, payments were routed through bank channels, meeting the provision&#039;s purpose. The Court allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant relief and set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 37 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372872</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in confirming the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. Despite uncrossed drafts, payments were routed through bank channels, meeting the provision&#039;s purpose. The Court allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant relief and set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>