<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 36 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372871</link>
    <description>The ITAT clarified the treatment of specific incomes for deduction u/s 10B, disallowed excess deduction claimed by the assessee, and restored the issue to the AO for verification. The judgment stressed the consistent treatment of incomes derived from the undertaking, ultimately allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 14:38:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 36 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372871</link>
      <description>The ITAT clarified the treatment of specific incomes for deduction u/s 10B, disallowed excess deduction claimed by the assessee, and restored the issue to the AO for verification. The judgment stressed the consistent treatment of incomes derived from the undertaking, ultimately allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>