<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 34 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the long term capital gain exemption under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act and delete the additions made under section 69C. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by documented evidence, and lacking direct evidence implicating the assessee in fraudulent activities. The actions taken in 2015 did not affect the validity of transactions from 2013 involving Turbotech Engineering Pvt Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 14:38:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 34 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the long term capital gain exemption under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act and delete the additions made under section 69C. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by documented evidence, and lacking direct evidence implicating the assessee in fraudulent activities. The actions taken in 2015 did not affect the validity of transactions from 2013 involving Turbotech Engineering Pvt Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>