<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 33 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty, ruling in favor of the assessee. The disputed issues were found to be debatable, and there was no evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the penalty was not justified in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 14:30:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 33 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty, ruling in favor of the assessee. The disputed issues were found to be debatable, and there was no evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the penalty was not justified in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>