<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 808 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277953</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) to reconsider both issues afresh after examining the assessment record and complying with Rule 46A requirements. The deletion of the disallowance under section 68 of the Act on account of unexplained credits and the deletion of disallowance out of operation and other expenses incurred by the assessee were set aside for fresh consideration by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 11:47:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 808 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277953</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) to reconsider both issues afresh after examining the assessment record and complying with Rule 46A requirements. The deletion of the disallowance under section 68 of the Act on account of unexplained credits and the deletion of disallowance out of operation and other expenses incurred by the assessee were set aside for fresh consideration by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>