<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 668 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277952</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes due to the admission of additional evidence without fulfilling the conditions laid down in Rule 46A. The issues of agricultural receipts, possession of agricultural land, LTCG exemption, and change in land utility were all contested in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 11:29:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 668 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277952</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes due to the admission of additional evidence without fulfilling the conditions laid down in Rule 46A. The issues of agricultural receipts, possession of agricultural land, LTCG exemption, and change in land utility were all contested in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>