<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16043</link>
    <description>House rent allowance under section 10(13A) operates subject to rule 2A of the Income-tax Rules, so exemption depends on actual rent expenditure. Where an assessee resides in his own house and does not pay rent, the allowance cannot be treated as exempt because no house rent is incurred and the amount forms part of salary. The contrary view that full exemption is available without regard to rule 2A was rejected, and exemption was denied on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16043</link>
      <description>House rent allowance under section 10(13A) operates subject to rule 2A of the Income-tax Rules, so exemption depends on actual rent expenditure. Where an assessee resides in his own house and does not pay rent, the allowance cannot be treated as exempt because no house rent is incurred and the amount forms part of salary. The contrary view that full exemption is available without regard to rule 2A was rejected, and exemption was denied on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>