<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1174 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277947</link>
    <description>Government orders issued to rehabilitate displaced teachers were held binding on the management, not merely permissive, because they implemented a policy scheme that removed vacancy constraints through supernumerary posts and continuity of service. The orders were also upheld as intra vires, as the statutory framework and executive power supported remedial directions in the special circumstances. A subordinate management could not disregard or collaterally attack the orders on a self-assessed view of invalidity; the proper course was a direct challenge. On relief, full back wages for the entire interregnum were declined, but back wages were allowed from the writ judgment date until deemed retirement, with liberty to recover the amount from the management.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 06:43:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1174 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277947</link>
      <description>Government orders issued to rehabilitate displaced teachers were held binding on the management, not merely permissive, because they implemented a policy scheme that removed vacancy constraints through supernumerary posts and continuity of service. The orders were also upheld as intra vires, as the statutory framework and executive power supported remedial directions in the special circumstances. A subordinate management could not disregard or collaterally attack the orders on a self-assessed view of invalidity; the proper course was a direct challenge. On relief, full back wages for the entire interregnum were declined, but back wages were allowed from the writ judgment date until deemed retirement, with liberty to recover the amount from the management.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>