<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277948</link>
    <description>The court set aside the service tax demand and penalties imposed on the Army Group Insurance Fund for life insurance services provided to armed forces members. The court noted the retrospective application of Section 105 of the Finance Act, 1994, exempting such services from service tax between 2004 and 2017. As a result, the impugned order was overturned, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 06:43:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277948</link>
      <description>The court set aside the service tax demand and penalties imposed on the Army Group Insurance Fund for life insurance services provided to armed forces members. The court noted the retrospective application of Section 105 of the Finance Act, 1994, exempting such services from service tax between 2004 and 2017. As a result, the impugned order was overturned, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>