<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 19 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372854</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s Miscellaneous Petition seeking rectification of an order passed for the AY 2011-12, emphasizing adherence to the time limit under Sec.254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite the Department filing the petition beyond the prescribed deadline, the Tribunal held it as not maintainable, highlighting the significance of complying with statutory timelines in tax matters for procedural fairness and efficiency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 06:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 19 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372854</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s Miscellaneous Petition seeking rectification of an order passed for the AY 2011-12, emphasizing adherence to the time limit under Sec.254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite the Department filing the petition beyond the prescribed deadline, the Tribunal held it as not maintainable, highlighting the significance of complying with statutory timelines in tax matters for procedural fairness and efficiency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>